by davidgilmanking

My initial step was to take the courtroom, what I perceived as the symbolic heart of the law, and move it from its coveted central location in the courthouse to the exterior.  I wanted this move to both serve as a symbolic gesture of the interconnection between the law and the surrounding community as well as to physically allow the community to see into the courtroom as ‘law’ takes place.  I built what I saw as an early parti model as seen below that separated and moved the eight courtrooms to the outside to serve as cornerstones to the courthouse itself.  I then played with the shape of the courtrooms in relation to each other.

At the same time I was looking at the macro level, I was also thinking about the micro-climate of the courtroom itself.  It was important to my concept to interconnect the activity in the courtroom with the public.  I wanted to erode a wall and literally make the courtroom feel as if it was spilling outside.  In order to remove distractions to those inside and to serve as a security measure, a wall would divide the two spaces.  This wall would serve as a ‘Translation Wall’, a wall that would have different levels of opacity to signify the varying ways people interpret and read the law.  This translation wall would pierce the structure as a figurative and physical threshold.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

by pdgaither

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

For this step of the process, I have spent time focusing on the courtroom itself, as well as the court-set. Through diagraming and models I am exploring what I want the courtroom to become. Abstracting hierarchy of spaces and volumes is a prominent idea I am really focusing upon right now in the process of my design.

Concept & Progress Models

by workbymariahroth

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The beginning of my design concept looked specifically at the courtroom itself and the shape that is takes on.

The development of my concept particularly looks at the shape of the volume within the courtroom.  I began to develop the idea that the judge, jury, and counsel table (law) area was a more prominent feature, and therefore should be more pronounced.  I did the by increasing the volume of this area.  I studied different ceiling styles to link the law area and the spectator area.  Such as a sloped ceiling, a stepped ceiling, and a sloped/stepped hybrid ceiling.

I then realized that the hybrid ceiling was most conducive to link the two areas but still allow for the area to feel different.  I then looked at the ways of stacking these courtrooms and the shapes they begin to form.  From there I have begun pushing and pulling to form more spaces, which is where I will go for next week.

Facilitating Movement

by fcahill

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The courthouse works as a machine that moves people through the judicial system in order for them to get on with their lives.  Therefore, the building should be able to help facilitate that movement and not be stagnant.  At the same time, there are multiple streams of movement throughout the building that work at different paces and must not intersect: the public realm is fast-paced and has destinations along the way (courtrooms) and while the private realm is also fast-paced it has it’s own set of paths and destinations depending on whether it is the judge, jury or litigant.

This design begins to look at different ways of facilitating that movement focusing on the courtroom set through sketches and models.

The Courtset: Early Concepts

by cchlebda

I began developing the courtset by examining the experience of the witness. Elevated on the stand, being scrupulously watched and heard by the jury, counselors, judge, and a crowd of specators, the witness is more than likely to experience discomfort. I wanted the form of the courtroom to allow the witness to see views out to nature, even if such views were only to the sky, to give them something soothing to look out towards if being the center of attention becomes too stressful.

I developed a form for the courtroom that would simultaneously allow the witness to view nature, focus attention towards those involved in the judicial process (judge, counselors, witness, jury), and allow daylight to enter and reflect through the space.

I then made a set of models to look at how this form of the courtroom, when repeated, could affect the form of the whole building. I discovered a duality to the form: a tall, almost imposing facade on one side, and a lower, looser, more accessible facade on the other side. This form started to express the oppositions inherent in the judicial process and the courthouse, e.g. freedom vs. law, public vs. private, liberation vs. punishment. I also noticed an opportunity for the lower side of the building to appear to emerge out of the earth, visually bringing Bryant Park over the building and symbolically making the law accessible to the public, emerging out of ‘freedom’. The following images show a series of studies using this idea of the park flowing over the courthouse, as well as ideas about intersection of public and private spaces (making the courthouse most accessible to the public).

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Conspiracy Theories and Interior Design

by caroothers

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

There are two trains of thought with the layout for the programmatic court set.  The court, and auxiliary rooms, each have their own spacial layout that has developed differently.

The idea of a courtroom as an individual volume created the sketch model arranging the four individual volumes.  The volumes allow for different formal shapes as well as affording  unique views and site responses.  This lets each courtroom have its own characteristics and formal expression.  How can the manipulation of volumes work together to form a set of rooms which work together for a common program?

Using the strong traditional patterns of circulation with a courtroom (from back to front) the second study looked into forming an implied circulation and creating spaces through these implied moments and perpendicular planes.  The courtroom’s form ends in a pinnacle that is formed from transforming the program circulation’s penultimate moment.  It is the spaces between the planes that create new spaces within the transformed circulation.  Can spaces be created from simple planes, and how can this new space interact with other spacial arrangements with the same form?

Legos are a lesson in process

by workbymichelletodd

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

It becomes interesting to see how childhood past-times link into later life. As a child, I passed many hours playing Legos with my brother, constructing and taking down. This approach has now proven to be beneficial in my quests to determine massing of court-sets.

The first two concepts that were completed, had a primary focus on how to achieve daylighting in a courtroom, something that can seem counter-intuitive to preserving safety and security. However, these two forms became to domesticated in appearance and seemed to cary no meaning to the site and the surrounding community.

From here, I took on the approach of designing my concepts in a similar manner as playing with Legos. I build volumes and create combinations of volumes until something seems to work well with what I am trying to achieve in my building. Upon deeper thinking, I concluded what I wanted to achieve in my building. I want to reveal an order in terms of privacy, with the most public spaces facing the public in terms in height and footprint. I also wish to achieve a strong correlation to my site analysis. The use of shifting linear forms in my site analysis led to my aspiration to have shifting volumes to create shared spaces, overlapping volumes to create outdoor spaces, highlighting the three different court types, and allowing for large surfaces to be oriented to the north and south to allow for daylighting. With these generic parameters, I have created a sequence of massing models to create a path to finding the best solution.

Process Models

by JP Mays

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

For Friday’s pin-up, I wanted to continue my exploration of the section – to understand the relation of the courtroom to the exterior.  I investigated the screen, and how to be transparent but also deal with solar control.

After Joelle’s suggestion to explore verticality, I made the wire model, which addressed the issue of weaving public, private, and secure within and up into the structure.  I also looked at stacking paired courtsets on top of lobby/reception/flex program at the ground level.

I am currently pursuing the combination of these two models; how to integrate volumes within a framework.