[space + justice]

The adventures of a UNCC architecture studio exploring the contemporary American courthouse.

Generic Courthouse Pun

by caroothers

This slideshow requires JavaScript.



The final review went well.  I was struggling this semester with the connection between my site analysis and my building’s final form.  I focused on ‘projection’, as it is the basis of a shadow, and the location of the site in relation to Uptown Charlotte district.  The building form took a form of projecting toward the city and the new Bryan Park district, bringing the two neighborhoods together in a public forum of law and order.  I still believe that I can move on with this project and develop a few areas a little bit further.  I have always understood final pin-ups as a stopping point, more than a finished product, as there are always places for improvement.  I got a lot out of this semester, and I felt that I worked outside my comfort zone with a more sculptural approach to the overall design.  The final outcome was what I expected, and I think that it is a wonderful solution to the courthouse.  Something that stands for the morals and bedrock of our society and can still remain open and accessible.

The Final Pinup

by fcahill

It’s hard to believe the semester is over for studio.  I have really enjoyed reading about everybody’s progress on the blog and it has definitely been an interesting experience to post my own stuff up-instead of just pinning up.  Below are my final drawings and model from last Wednesday.  The review went well and I was pleased with the feedback I received-it was both positive and constructive.

View of Skatepark and Stair

View of Skatepark and Stair

View of Main Entrance and Skatepark

View of Main Entrance and Skatepark

Courtroom

Courtroom

View from Suttle Avenue

View from Suttle Avenue

1st Floor + Site

1st Floor + Site

Building + Site Section Cut

Building + Site Section Cut

My Presentation Board

My Presentation Board

Board + Models

Board + Models

South Entrance

South Entrance

Site Model

Site Model

The Jury is In

by JP Mays

This past Wednesday was our final review, and I think overall mine went well.  My design was generally received positively, though several good points were raised.  One thing I could have focused more on was the experience of the public throughout the building, including clarity of circulation and access.  Also, since my scheme was ten stories, a greater focus on the elevators would probably be more crucial than a monumental stair.  This was a very challenging semester, in a good way, and I was on the whole very pleased with my final design.  Below are some images from the final review.

persp1_render_flat_150_small

View of the main entry, looking east towards Uptown.

section1_flat_150_small

Section through typical Civil courtrooms, and north bar of the main level.

section2_render_flat_150_small

Section through main entry and monumental stair.

C:UsersjpDocumentscourthouse.11.25 - Sheet - P107 - Plans.pd

Basement, First floor, Second floor, typical floors, and terrace floors

Site Plan
Site Plan

The Final Verdict

by cchlebda

It’s hard to believe this semester is over! Final jury was on Wednesday, and I received very positive feedback about my courthouse design. I’m ending my part of this blog with the images I presented of my final design. Thanks for reading!

Final Boards Layout: Layout3FINAL

by pdgaither

My Previous post looked at the new design I have developed for the final. Below are a few images of the new model I have built to further represent my ideas as I make the final push for the final review. At our peer review, I focused on material selection for the building as well as perspective views I wish to show. They will help with the relationship of the architecture to the landscape and how the two work together. Digressing to the idea of material, I am using stacked stone on the flat wall portions of my building and where the building curves I am using either a zinc paneling or a composite aluminium panel.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Peer-Review

by fcahill

For the peer-review I focused on what views I would focus on for the final review, materials for the building and showed the skatepark research I had done in order to decided what kind of skatepark (size, materials, location) to put in the site and how it would relate to the courthouse.  The perspectives focus on the view of the building and how it relates to the site versus material.  I included to ‘model’ perspectives that I plan on rendering similarly.

After the review, it was decided that the skatepark needs to be included in the perspectives but sections would not help my presentation because my building rotates so much it would not make anything clearer.  I also decided that my model needs to be more than a massing model but more a representation of the building and site and how they work together.

My plans are in the process of changing (after talking with Chrissy) and how my program dictated my form too much so they are not included.  The next few steps will be the finalization of my plans (with furniture, wall thickness and windows) and then I will begin to figure how to build my model and what types of materials I will be using.

Program Diagram Revisited

by JP Mays

I have been working on revising my program diagram, and have developed two options.  Version 1 expands both the courtrooms and the level 1 spaces, while Version 2 only expands the courtrooms.  I can’t decide between the two, so I thought I’d ask the class’ opinion.  What do you think?

Version 1

Version 2

 

Beyond this, any other comments?  Does the color read well?  Lineweight/type?

Last-Minute Improvements

by cchlebda

At our pin up on Friday, my peers questioned the way that the design of my atrium forced courtroom visitors to enter and see the underside of a stair. This was an aspect of my design that I had known was flawed, but I did not think I had enough time to fix it. However, after being specifically called out on it within 15 minutes of my peers’ commentary, I realized it was probably worth taking the time to address the issue. Fortunately, the time I took to work on the stair issue over the weekend has paid off. The solution I have developed not only better resolves the underside-of-the-stair issue by making use of that space, but it also refines and resolves other issues I had with my atrium design that had not been worked out.

FRIDAY’S DESIGN: Atrium from Level 1 | Note how you can see security equipment from the atrium, the exit is not clear, and the user has to turn around to face the stair to see the double helix.

The solution to the stair issue was fairly simple: rotate the public stair at level 1 slightly and shift it over about 6 feet, which also shifts where the atrium access point from the security screening area is. This one change does so much for the design. (1) For one thing, it blocks the view from the atrium to the security screening equipment, which had been bothering me before because I didn’t want courthouse visitors to be reminded of the “hassle” of going through security during their already stressful time at court. (2) The entry to the atrium from security now aligns with the exit back into the cafe, so that a user in the atrium can clearly see the exit (not the security screening equipment, like they used to). (3) The lower space under the public stair is utilized as seating space. Since the stair was shifted, it was moved closer to the elevators, so this bench might be used by people waiting for the elevator to arrive. (4) When the user enters the atrium from security, he enters into the center of the double-helix stairs. This allows the user to really experience the double helix/separate circulation paths idea in a way that is not confusing (as approaching from the side might have been). The stairs as formal elements also create a linear dynamicism that might guide the user through the space.

CURRENT DESIGN: Level 1 Plan | Note how shifting the public stair to the left aligns entry into the atrium with the exit and blocks views to security from the atrium

CURRENT DESIGN: Atrium view from Security | Note how the user now enters into the atrium through the previously underutilized space at the center of the double helix stairs

Overall, I am very happy with the way I have resolved the atrium stair. It feels so good when working through design challenges ultimately results in richer and better solutions!

Print it out to mark it up

by workbymichelletodd

With the final days of the semester approaching, our studio had a collaborative pin-up so that we could provide each other insight on what we think would improve and enhance our projects. While input from peers is very important and can be very valuable in driving the design process, sometimes a pin-up is valuable in that it forces you to step back and be critical about your own work. It never fails that something looks differently from 10 feet away than it does on your computer screen or 2 feet in front of you pinned up at your desk. To prepare for the pin-up on Friday, I created two rendered images that reveal my technique that I intend to use for my final project. By having to print them out, as well as my plans, views for perspectives,  and sections, errors and improvements can be noticed more readily than if they are kept on the computer screen. With this pin-up I have realized corrections I need to make in order to make my presentation that much better for the final review.

The Usefulness of Peer Reviews

by workbymariahroth

Yesterday, Friday November 16, our studio had a peer review regarding where our designs where and our presentation style for final review.  I forgot how helpful peer reviews could be in refining my presentation style.  My peers helped me understand the readability of my presentation from a juror’s view point.  From their comments I noted all the little comments that add up on a presentation.  For example my style of labeling my floor plans, I know that adding furniture and color coding is the best style (for myself) so that everyone can easy and quickly understand my plans.  Another major category I got comments in was my rendering technique.  For one, most everyone thought that purely line rendering conveyed a good amount of information and that if I cleaned them up they are excellent, without material or color.  This was surprising to me because I thought that each perspective needed rendering, I am planning on looking into this further so I can decide if I like this technique.  Second, I learned the style of the one rendering I did, prismacolor marker, was not as successful as I had hoped.  The marker gave an unwanted grain in some area, while in other the grain greatly helped.  I was given the suggestion of watercolor pencils, so I will be looking into this technique and how I can encompass it in with my rendering style.  A third category of my presentation was my bus depot.  I had lost the readability of my bus depot within my floor plans.  This was a wake up call for me because the bus depot is something that I have worked with since the beginning to incorporate and the last thing I want to do is lose it when I present.  However, I believe small changes will fix this and allow my bus depot to read accurately.  I believe this peer review was extremely helpful and gave me many things to work on and refine for the final presentation.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started